what would a framework for the critical analysis of art discourse look like?

Dear Webmaster
I applied to join Rational Painting some days ago. I keep logging on to the site to see new people being welcomed everyday. Unfortunately I don’t seem to have been accepted.
I wonder whether this is because the process takes a long time or whether my application was not acceptable.

Here’s hoping because I love the prospect of seeing discourse on art that stands up to critical analysis.

 

This is my email to Rational Painting,  It shows what I would like to see – a way of assessing discourse on art for its truth value/for its use value.  for example, ‘this painting is too narrative’

can I begin to develop such a thing?

Is my motive merely me looking for some smart reply to things said to me which I didn’t like?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s